It shows that when very elite schools practice affirmative action in admissions, which they do, it does effectively raise the admission rate for people of color - especially African Americans - by a lot.” Race & classĪrcidiacono and his coauthors dug into admissions records for over 300,000 domestic applicants to the admissions classes of 2014–2019, of which roughly 142,000 applied to Harvard, 57,000 applied to UNC as in-state candidates, and 105,000 applied to the same college from out of state. “It doesn’t change my support for affirmative action to see his numbers, though I certainly don’t disagree with the research findings. Arcidiacono’s line of research “makes reasonable points,” Holzer said, while arguing that it does not invalidate the use of racial considerations by admissions officers. A proponent of race-based affirmative action, he signed a 2018 brief (alongside multiple Nobel laureates) defending Harvard’s policies that was filed in a lower-court iteration of the suit. Georgetown economist Harry Holzer finds those projections plausible. According to Arcidiacono’s latest study, a significant reversal could shrink the percentage of African American students admitted to Harvard by more than two-thirds. With plaintiffs asking the nation’s highest court to bar the consideration of race and ethnicity as a factor in the college application process, and Republicans in Congress pursuing legislation that would force colleges to publicize their use of non-academic characteristics in admissions, the stage is being set for a major rollback of affirmative action as it has been practiced for half a century. Opening briefs have been filed in the case, which will be heard in the 2022-23 term. Those questions are becoming more concrete by the month. So in order to get a sense for whether affirmative action has gone too far or has not gone far enough, you have to understand the role that race plays currently, and you can’t do that without the data.” “But there’s a large range of possibilities, from just race as a tiebreaker to fully equal outcomes. “So much of the debate about affirmative action is happening in this binary where you’re either for it or against it,” Arcidiacono observed. Related What the Harvard Affirmative Action Victory Means for Students Who Face ‘Endemic Inequalities’ in K-12 Schools In an interview with The 74, he said he hoped his work would help clarify the public debate over one of the most divisive issues in American politics. Peter Arcidiacono, an economist at Duke University and the studies’ lead author, has provided expert testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs, who claim that the storied institutions have systematically discriminated against Asian applicants. University of North Carolina - that were consolidated for oral argument before the court. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. Those findings, and those of the preceding papers, are built on data that was made publicly available during the discovery phase of two lawsuits - Students for Fair Admissions v. Their chances of acceptance are drastically higher than they would be in the absence of affirmative action, but with a somewhat counterintuitive addendum: preferential treatment is relatively weaker for minority applicants from poor and working-class backgrounds than it is for their peers from more affluent families. The paper, part of a series of studies conducted in the wake of high-profile litigation against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, shows that Hispanic and African American applicants to both colleges enjoy substantial advantages relative to whites and Asian Americans. With the Supreme Court poised to reduce or even eliminate affirmative action in college admissions, a recent study has offered a unique window into the magnitude of racial preferences in America’s elite colleges. Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |